Page 10 of 39

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:35 pm
by donnie
Yes, just can't look at it too long without getting dizzy. :D I've heard the Woolworth Building is very beautiful. Have you ever seen it, NJ girl? And I don't believe it is too far from the World Trade Center site. I don't know if it sustained any damage on 911.

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:28 pm
by Kitty
No, I have never seen it. If I knew back then what I did now, I'd have seen much more historical type stuff when I lived in NJ. For example, it's annoying that I was so close to film history and hadn't become interested enough in it yet to think about it.
Someday!

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:49 pm
by donnie
Yes, that's right! The whole film industry was in/around Fort Lee, wasn't it, if I remember right? Did you ever do any more reading in the Linda Arvidson book where she talks about their jaunts over to NJ?

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:51 pm
by Kitty
I did not, but writing that posts made me think of it. It's on my Kindle, I will!

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 10:15 am
by Kitty
Leo Tolstoy telling a story to his grandchildren.

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:57 pm
by donnie
Yes, that's a delightful one! I remember seeing it years ago. Tolstoy is such an interesting person.

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 2:19 pm
by Kitty
If you can believe it..... This picture was taken in 1902. It's called The Sketch.

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:20 pm
by donnie
That is stunning! And it sure doesn't look that old, does it? I can't figure out exactly why, though.

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:11 pm
by Kitty
I think it's the lighting maybe.

Re: Vintage Photos at Random

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:31 pm
by donnie
Yes, that may be it. The background looks its age, but if you cover up the upper two-thirds and look at the shadows, etc., in the foreground, it looks more like a modern photo.