Re:
Speech: The Function of Gestures (1950)
donnie wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 10:30 pm
This one is rather odd.
Very odd.
donnie wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 10:30 pm
I don't really think the problem with the people of Africa speech is lack of gestures, do you?

I doubt the most animated motions in the world are going to pull that one out of the fire.
What in the world is this speech about, anyway? So the people of africa are all different shapes and sizes, just like everyone else of the world. Did his third grader write this speech for him last night at 8pm before he went to bed?
donnie wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 10:30 pm
The graphic of the arm sprouting out of the head looks
kind of very strange, as does that revolving display in the store window.
Yes, the head/arm illustration was unnecessary, and I don't think the revolving display would even be effective. It is going way too fast, and definitely detracts from the product. (What is that, anyway?

)
donnie wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 10:30 pm
I think the "good" speaker is kind of
overdoing it with the gestures, do you? And the reformed George at the end is
definitely overdoing it.
The gestures are just too broad. Be normal. Do you really swing your arms around
that much in normal conversation? I'd be sure to give him a wide berth if I was around him!
And the reformed George looks like a very drunk George. He's so dishevelled and wild armed!
It's interesting that the narrator claims that a good speaker should be seen as well as heard. That point proves to be wrong immediately. After all, the narrator is also a speaker, and we don't need to see him to find him interesting. It's mostly inflection and a feeling that the speaker believes in his words that makes a story or speech engaging. Gestures come naturally, and if they are overdone, it's exactly as if the speaker is acting or trying to pull one over on you. Are they
really trying to say that people on radio are boring? Nope, just the stilted overacting performers are. Have you ever heard those monotone, yelling droners on public radio, with their voices bouncing off the walls with rarely a believable inflection in their voice?
That is the boring speaker. Care about your subject and be excited to teach otheres about it rather than worrying too much on performance, and it will come naturally and be interesting.
Maybe you totally disagree with me, but that is my opinion. *hops off soapbox*
Re: You and Your Friends (1946)
donnie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:25 pm
I wonder why all the titles are in
BIG BOLD CAPS.
I think it's interesting that there are film credits. B. K. Blake was an Oscar Nominated producer of short films. George Blake (director) was his son, who also directed a series of shorts called Candid Microphone. Scriptwriter A.R. Perkins is listed on IMDb to have written two scripts: This one and You and Your Family. Don Malkames (Photography) was in the photography and cinematography business for many decades. He started when he was 17 as a photographer for Fox. Film editor Leonard Anderson also had a long career, and edited
The Honeymooners. Narrator Don Goddard was a newscaster and after he retired from broadcasting, he moved to Arizona and became a therapist, best known for helping older people with addiction and alcoholism.
donnie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:25 pm
The answers to most of the questions here are pretty obvious.
My ratings - You know, the ones you didn't ask for:
Frank: Minus (I mean, why did he even bring up Eddie? Jealous? Trying to steer the girl away from Eddie so he can have her for himself?)
Mary: Plus (She isn't engaging in any of this bashing Eddie nonsense.)
donnie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:25 pm
Betty at 2:25.

That gal is hungry.
Betty: Neutral. (Not everything is black and white, Mr. Goddard! My first thought was maybe she doesn't get enough food at home. And it's not like she took the food across the street. She's still in the same room, and can easily talk through bites.)
Mary: Minus (It looks like she's learned a bit about gestures from the last film we watched!)
Joe: Minus (Stop moping at parties. This is worse than what Betty did. In fact, it kind of seems like he's more antisocial than any of them. After all, he was alone in the dining room in the beginning, and then he was alone on the couch, making Ethel ask him what was wrong. Why is he here again?)
Ethel: Minus (Blabbermouth! 'Nuff said!)
George: Plus (Didn't even complain!)
Betty: Minus (Double-crosser!)
Bill: Minus (Girl-stealer!)
Frank: Plus (Didn't stand her up)
Ethel: Plus (Understanding, and still got up and danced with him joyously afterward!)
donnie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 26, 2025 9:25 pm
1:27 Ethel looks a little too young to be in this group. Good dancer, though. And do you think Bill has enough oil in his hair?
Ethel looks young, but compare her to Bill. I think he looks pretty young, too. They are probably about 14 or 15. Now Mary, well, she looks like she's 22. Bill looks like he could be Jon Bauman's rival in the hair grease department.
I enjoyed over-analysing this one.
