So Phyllis Wicke, then, was the governess who was actually framed by Angelique?
It's been so long since we were in the present time that I'd forgotten some of the dynamics between the characters. I was first confused by the animosity between Julia and Carolyn and between Julia and Barnabas. That last scene brought back to me that Carolyn must still be under Barnabas's spell. And Julia, I guess, is still trying to protect Vicky from Barnabas.
It looks so odd to see Joan Bennett in a '60s gown after being used to her for so long in the 18th century dress.
I enjoyed seeing the shocked looks on Barnabas's face when it was obvious that Vicky had been in the past. I wonder why he is fearful at what she knows. If the original "witch" (Phyllis) didn't know the truth about what Barnabas was, why would Vicky as her stand-in?
I wonder if Peter will ever be able to keep his promise and travel through time to be reunited with Vicky again. And I wonder if he ever learned that it wasn't Vicky who was executed. But then, how would that be, anyway, since it wasn't Phyllis who'd been on trial all that time, etc. So many questions!
And Buzz never showed up in 1795.
One of my great disappointments... Oh, well, one can't have everything.
Man. Doesn't it seem like ages ago the days of Burke Devlin and Bill Malloy?? In one way, the plot of this show seems to move so slowly, yet look at the amazing distance covered between then and now—less than two years. I looked it up, and the first episode aired in June 1966 and 461 in April of '68.