Not according to The Playground Magazine in this June 1925 article They sit in poor ventilation, strain their eyes, and attend during the afternoon when they should be outside playing! It's nice to know that some things truly never change. In the 20s it was the movies, in the 50s and decades after that TV, then computers, today it's phones. Maybe it was books right after Gutenberg
Should Children Go to the Movies?
- BettyLouSpence
- Posts: 2447
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:29 pm
- Location: Gashouse Gables
- Contact:
Should Children Go to the Movies?
I wish my life was a non-stop Hollywood movie show
a fantasy world of celluloid villains and heroes
Because celluloid heroes never feel any pain
and celluloid heroes never really die...
a fantasy world of celluloid villains and heroes
Because celluloid heroes never feel any pain
and celluloid heroes never really die...
Re: Should Children Go to the Movies?
A most interesting article!
I don't think I'd be too interested in going to the movies after reading that description of the ventilation and germ-infested conditions. And the report from the eye specialist in Glasgow is interesting. (Cross eyes? Optic congestion??)
I seem to sense an ulterior (and possibly financial) motive here with this tremendous emphasis on keeping children outdoors (which is, admittedly, probably not a bad idea). The Playground Magazine. That's sure an odd-sounding periodical. I wonder if, maybe, manufacturers of playground equipment could be the promulgators behind this publication? Or am I too cynical? What do you think?
I guess virtual reality headsets will be next?BettyLouSpence wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 8:06 pmIt's nice to know that some things truly never change. In the 20s it was the movies, in the 50s and decades after that TV, then computers, today it's phones. Maybe it was books right after Gutenberg
I don't think I'd be too interested in going to the movies after reading that description of the ventilation and germ-infested conditions. And the report from the eye specialist in Glasgow is interesting. (Cross eyes? Optic congestion??)
I seem to sense an ulterior (and possibly financial) motive here with this tremendous emphasis on keeping children outdoors (which is, admittedly, probably not a bad idea). The Playground Magazine. That's sure an odd-sounding periodical. I wonder if, maybe, manufacturers of playground equipment could be the promulgators behind this publication? Or am I too cynical? What do you think?