A delightful 23 seconds

Anything and everything silent photoplay!
Post Reply
User avatar
donnie
Posts: 7643
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:28 am

A delightful 23 seconds

Post by donnie »

...is À la conquête de l'air (Conquest of the Air) from 1901. :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nH86796tFbM

User avatar
Kitty
Posts: 10135
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:57 pm

Re: A delightful 23 seconds

Post by Kitty »

That is so cool! Their effects were akin to magic tricks.
You trying to tell me you didn't hear that shriek? That was something trying to get out of its premature grave, and I don't want to be here when it does. - Phantom of the Paradise (1974)

User avatar
dachshundonstilts
Posts: 1168
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: A delightful 23 seconds

Post by dachshundonstilts »

Cool. According to Wiki, the earliest use of double exposure.
"I feel so low, old chap, that I could get on stilts and walk under a dachshund." - Monty, It (1927)

User avatar
donnie
Posts: 7643
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:28 am

Re: A delightful 23 seconds

Post by donnie »

How would the aerial footage have been made? I'm assuming from a camera on a balloon? Or perhaps more likely a pan from up on the Eiffel Tower? I don't recall seeing any footage like that from that early.

User avatar
dachshundonstilts
Posts: 1168
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: A delightful 23 seconds

Post by dachshundonstilts »

The Eiffel Tower theory makes sense.
"I feel so low, old chap, that I could get on stilts and walk under a dachshund." - Monty, It (1927)

User avatar
BettyLouSpence
Posts: 2447
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:29 pm
Location: Gashouse Gables
Contact:

Re: A delightful 23 seconds

Post by BettyLouSpence »

I love the contraption. Would it be considered steampunk these days?
I wish my life was a non-stop Hollywood movie show
a fantasy world of celluloid villains and heroes
Because celluloid heroes never feel any pain
and celluloid heroes never really die...

User avatar
donnie
Posts: 7643
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:28 am

Re: A delightful 23 seconds

Post by donnie »

BettyLouSpence wrote:
Fri Feb 11, 2022 6:46 pm
I love the contraption. Would it be considered steampunk these days?
Sure! I'd say it's quintessentially steampunkish. :)

Post Reply